Perpustakaan IAIN Kediri

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Login Staf
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Penanda Bagikan

Text

Discourse markers usage among Islamic higher education students

RIZKY SILVIA PRATIWI - Nama Orang;

This study focuses on discourse markers' usage of discussion sections among Islamic Higher Education Students. In this case, the researcher concerns about markers that connect among sentences or clauses to each other. It was conducted because the researcher was curious about the students' mistakes or errors in using discourse markers, especially in discussion sections among Islamic Higher Education Students. This study presents to analyze the accuracy of students and students' problems using discourse markers.

The corpus-based study is used to be the method of study. 40 discussion sections of undergraduate theses from the English Department of IAIN Kediri, IAIN Tulungagung, IAIN Ponorogo, IAIN Salatiga, UIN Surabaya, UIN Walisongo. UIN Banten, and UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, reported in 2019 were chosen randomly as the object of the study. The instruments were Antconc 3.2.4. to deal with the discourse markers' sources and tables of analysis that have functions for finding types, accuracy, and students' problems using discourse markers. The theory of Bruce Fraser in 2009 and Kao and Chen in 2011 as the main theories that the researcher used in this present study. The data that were studied were from 8 e-theses repositories of some Islamic universities from Indonesia. Analyzing the information uses Antconc 3.2.4 and manual analysis to find the valid data of discourse markers usage.

The result reveals three types of discourse markers usage, elaborative. inferential, and contrastive markers. From 40 discussion sections, the total accuracy and inaccuracy are 290, with 111 accuracies and 179 inaccuracy frequencies. Meanwhile, in the students' problems, there are 44 distractions, 38 non-equivalent exchanges, 52 overuse, 26 semantic incompletion, 36 surface logicality, and 43 wrong relation problems. Besides, the researcher did not find other types and students' problems outside of the researcher's theory.


Ketersediaan
#
Perpustakaan IAIN Kediri KT TBI-21 015
2176015
Tersedia namun tidak untuk dipinjamkan - No Loan
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
KT TBI-21 015
Penerbit
Kediri : IAIN Kediri., 2021
Deskripsi Fisik
xii, 56 hlm., 29 cm.
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
KT TBI-21
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
Ed. 1, cet. 1
Subjek
discourse markers
Discussion
Indonesian EFL learners
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Tesis Mhs. S2 (NIM. 92600319027)
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
Tidak Ada Data
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Perpustakaan IAIN Kediri
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?