Text
The quality of UAS examanination in english test for the last grade in SMA N 2 Pare
Fatkhiyatul Afifah, The Quality of UAS examination in English Test in SMA N 2 Pare, Thesis, English Department, The The Faculty of Education STAIN Kediri, 2012. Advisors: (1) Fathor Rasyid, M. Pd, (2) Toyyibah, S.S, M.Pd
Key Words: evaluation, validity, reliability, difficulty level, discrimination power.
It is believed that without the evaluation it would be almost impossible to teach. As students need to know their abilities and the teachers use some kind of evaluations. Evaluation of teaching learning process can be administered in the form of tests. In other words, teaching must be followed by testing. The information gained can be useful for both students and teacher. Hence, there are two points interrelated. Firstly, the test is concerned with the teaching that has taken place. It is that the test administered should give the students feeling that the teacher’s evaluation matches what they have taught and sense of accomplishment. Secondly, the teaching is concerned with the test. The teacher can diagnose his effort in his teaching whether or not his teaching has been effective. According to Sunardi Djiwandono pointed out to analysis the criteria of a good test comprise: (1) validity, (2) reliability, (3) difficulty level, and (4) discrimination power.
The study is intended to find the quality of English test in SMA N 2 Pare. This research uses descriptive quantitative research because the researcher describes the analysis of quality of UAS examination in English test for the last grade in SMA N 2 Pare. The researcher measures the criteria of a good test, there are validity, reliability, level of difficulty and discrimination power. The research used interview and documentation for data collection. Then, for the instrument research, she spends to analysis the test using manually calculating to do it.
According to the result of the research which is related to the theory, for the validity, the test is representative enough for it content validity, because almost some of material has not been tested. And for reliability, it is very low reliability, the value of R is -0,111 and 0,041. Then, for the difficulty level, it finds there are easy items test, it is about 54% and 48%. And for Discrimination power that gets the poor items test in generally. We can conclude that, the tests are not good test because its quality for validity and reliability are not good, then for the level of difficulty this test items are very easy for student and the discrimination power are poor. It means that most of the item tests need to review in depth again, because the character of a good test is not too difficult and very easy.
Tidak tersedia versi lain